🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access found a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has become a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.